-
AI Magic
-
AI Features
-
AI: How it Works
- Crafting Powerful Promps
- Gemini Fact-Checks Itself
- Copilot Helps Write Essays
- Gemini: Stays Up-to-date
- Gemini: Different Answers
- Gemini: Reliable Sources
- Keyword v Natural Language Searching
- Can Gemini Analyze Text?
- Free Microsoft Copilot Account
- ChatGPT: Ten Reference Questions
- Create useful prompts for writing an essay.
- How do I get a free ChatGPT account?
- What makes Perplexity AI different from traditional search engines?
- Limitations of Perplexity AI's Current Technology
- How does Perplexity decribe itself?
- How do I sign up for a free Microsoft Copilot account?
- Show Remaining Articles ( 1 ) Collapse Articles
-
AI Guides
-
AI Prompts
-
AI Tips & Tricks
Good v Bad Prompts
Bad AI Prompts |
Good AI Prompts |
Explanation |
---|---|---|
Vague or overly broad requests (e.g., “Write something about history.”) |
Specific and focused requests (e.g., “Summarize the key events of the French Revolution and its impact on European politics.”) |
Vague prompts give the AI no direction, resulting in generic or irrelevant responses. Specific prompts guide the AI to provide targeted and useful information. |
Lack of context or background information (e.g., “Explain this theory.”) |
Inclusion of necessary context (e.g., “Explain the theory of relativity, focusing on its implications for our understanding of time and space.”) |
Without context, the AI might make incorrect assumptions or provide incomplete responses. Providing context ensures the AI understands the request’s scope and depth. |
Ambiguous or unclear phrasing (e.g., “Tell me about that thing.”) |
Clear and concise language (e.g., “Describe the process of photosynthesis in plants.”) |
Ambiguous prompts lead to confusion and potentially incorrect responses. Clear prompts leave no room for misinterpretation, resulting in more accurate and relevant information. |
Unrealistic expectations (e.g., “Write a novel in the style of Shakespeare.”) |
Reasonable and achievable requests (e.g., “Generate a sonnet about love in the style of Shakespeare.”) |
AI has limitations. Unrealistic prompts lead to disappointment or subpar results. Matching the request to the AI’s capabilities ensures a more satisfactory outcome. |
Overly complex or convoluted sentence structures |
Simple and straightforward sentence structures |
Complex sentences can be difficult for the AI to parse, leading to errors or misunderstandings. Simple sentences are easier to process, reducing the risk of misinterpretations. |
Neglecting to specify desired format or style (e.g., “Write about climate change.”) |
Inclusion of format and style preferences (e.g., “Write a persuasive essay about the urgency of addressing climate change, using data and examples to support your arguments.”) |
Specifying format and style guides the AI to produce content that aligns with your expectations. Without this guidance, the AI might generate responses that don’t meet your specific needs. |
Ignoring ethical considerations or potential biases (e.g., “Write a story about a group of criminals.”) |
Consideration of ethical implications and biases (e.g., “Write a story about a group of individuals from diverse backgrounds who are wrongly accused of a crime, highlighting the flaws in the justice system.”) |
Prompts that promote harmful stereotypes or misinformation can perpetuate social inequalities. Ethical prompts encourage the AI to produce content that is fair, unbiased, and responsible. |
Overreliance on technical jargon or overly formal language |
Use of natural and conversational language |
Technical jargon can alienate audiences or create confusion. Natural language is more approachable and engaging, making the information more accessible to a wider range of users. |
Failure to proofread or revise prompts |
Thorough proofreading and revision of prompts |
Errors in prompts can lead to inaccurate or irrelevant responses. Careful review ensures the prompt is clear, concise, and free of errors, resulting in better results from the AI. |